Assessment information

Assessment requirements for MSc courses and how to submit appeals or complaints.

Each taught course that the School delivers in an academic session has related assessment rules, which have been agreed by the relevant Programmes Committee or the Board of Studies before the new session begins.

Progression to Dissertation

The MSc programmes consist of a taught component (120 credits of compulsory and optional courses) and a dissertation (60 credits). Upon completion of the taught component of the programme, any student satisfying the following conditions will be permitted to progress to the dissertation:

  • an average across 120 taught credits of at least 50%
  • AND a minimum of 80 credits at 50%.

Please note that candidates are not allowed to resit an assessment in order to facilitate progression to the dissertation unless they have a Null Sit due to valid Exceptional Circumstances.

Assessment requirements

The overall result for your Masters degree is arrived at by combining the average result of the taught courses (both compulsory and optional) and the result for the dissertation. The table below provides further information about the marks that are required for each classification. Students who do not qualify for a Masters degree may be awarded a Postgraduate Certificate or Diploma. 

Grade requirements
 DiplomaMScMSc with MeritMSc with Distinction
Taught course average (across 120 credits)40% or above50% or above60% or above70% or above
80 credits at 50%-YesYesYes
80 credits at 40%Yes---
Project/Dissertation-50% or above60% or above70% or above

(In order to qualify for the Postgraduate Certificate, students must have an average of at least 40% across 60 credits of taught courses, and to pass a minimum of 40 credits at 40%.) 

Please note that candidates are not allowed to resit an assessment in order to be considered for the award of MSc, unless they have a Null Sit due to valid Exceptional Circumstances.

Scaling

It is not always easy to predict in advance how hard or easy an exam or other assessment will turn out to be.  For that reason, to ensure the outcome of assessment is fair and reasonable, exams and other substantial assessments are “moderated”.   This means that the marks received on the common marking scheme may differ from the “raw” mark on the script that was originally generated by the marker(s) of the assessment.  

In performing this scaling, we pay attention to a number of sources of information such as: whether it is apparent from student attempts that parts of the assessment were easier or harder than expected; whether the distribution of class marks is in accordance with norms for pass rates, proportion of A grades, etc. In response to this information it may be decided to scale marks up or down.

The final marks for components of assessment are decided by the Board of Examiners.  They may, after discussion, decide to adjust the moderated marks, by changing or introducing a scaling.   In particular, moderated marks for coursework may on occasion be adjusted by the Board of Examiners.

Unsatisfactory performance

Under the rules of the University, the Head of the School of Mathematics can, on the advice of the Programme Director, formally request a student who is not performing adequately, or has otherwise breached University discipline, to withdraw from the programme at any time during the programme.

Appeals

The University regulations for postgraduate appeals can be found in the University's Code Student Conduct and Academic Services Appeals.

Code of student conduct

Student appeals

Complaints

We would encourage students to raise any problems (either academic or personal) as quickly as possible by approaching their Student Representative,  Student Advisor, course staff and the Advice Place, as appropriate. When such matters cannot be resolved informally, the University has a formal student complaints procedure.

University complaints procedure